Google Code Jam 2009 - Round1, Some Statistics by Region

Total Number of Participants in Round 1:
2028 Round1-A
2836 Round1-B
2337 Round1-C
7201 total (includes duplicate)



Qualified Candidates grouped by country:

Country	Qualified	Total Participants
China	656	1322
Russia	336	519
United States	217	546
India	188	904
Japan	136	322
Poland	125	233
Brazil	96	267
Ukraine	96	195
South Korea	93	195
Romania	54	131
Taiwan	52	144
Canada	49	115
Belarus	48	73
Australia	46	99
Vietnam	41	92
Indonesia	39	104
Argentina	36	95
Bulgaria	36	67
Germany	35	81
Bangladesh	31	72
Egypt	29	92
Slovakia (Slovak Republic)	29	46
Hong Kong	28	64
Hungary	28	94
Netherlands	25	46
Spain	23	71
Thailand	22	76
Italy	21	66
South Africa	21	46
United Kingdom	21	55
Czech Republic	19	47
Lithuania	18	30
France	16	65
Sweden	16	27
Croatia	15	20
Colombia	14	52
Mexico	14	62
Kazakhstan	13	42
Georgia	13	15
Israel	13	44
Portugal	13	34
Peru	12	34
Serbia	11	26
Finland	11	18
New Zealand	10	27
Armenia	9	17
Venezuela	9	25
Latvia	9	17
Turkey	8	43
Austria	8	18
Macedonia	6	11
Belgium	5	18
Sri Lanka	5	18
Singapore	5	15
Estonia	5	16
Norway	5	8
Moldova	5	13
Switzerland	5	15
Denmark	5	14
Slovenia	5	7
Lebanon	4	13
Greece	4	18
Bolivia	3	5
Kyrgyzstan	3	5
Iran	3	8
Malaysia	3	12
Morocco	2	12
Philippines	2	10
Cuba	1	1
Uzbekistan	1	2
Bahrain	1	2
Namibia	1	2
Congo, Republic of	1	2
Bosnia and Herzegovina	1	3
Nepal	1	4
Chile	1	6
Jordan	1	4
Iceland	1	1
Rwanda	1	1
Pakistan	1	18
Mongolia	1	1
Uruguay	1	5
Syria	1	2
Dominican Republic	1	5
Malta	1	1

For more detail on the contest:
http://code.google.com/codejam

Contest Analysis (official):
http://code.google.com/codejam/contest/dashboard?c=90101#s=a

Qualification Round Stats:
http://siddiq-technology.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-code-jam-qualification-round.html


If you like to see more detailed statistics, please comments!

Google Code Jam Qualification Round 2009 - Some Statistics by Region

Total Number of Participants : 8605

Top 10 participants grouped by country:


Solved problems / attempts:


Participants by Country (where score = 99):

Country	Participants who did 99 score
China	511
United States	265
Russia	262
India	142
Poland	98
Ukraine	88
Japan	77
Brazil	68
South Korea	63
Canada	51
Romania	50
Australia	41
Taiwan	38
Bulgaria	33
Belarus	32
Bangladesh	30
Argentina	30
Singapore	29
United Kingdom	29
Hong Kong	28
Egypt	24
Germany	23
Slovakia (Slovak Republic)	23
Netherlands	21
Indonesia	21
Thailand	20
Hungary	20
Spain	19
France	17
Vietnam	17
Croatia	15
Sweden	13
Italy	13
Czech Republic	12
South Africa	12
Mexico	11
Lithuania	11
Kazakhstan	11
Georgia	11
Finland	10
Portugal	9
New Zealand	9
Latvia	9
Peru	9
Colombia	9
Israel	7
Serbia	7
Venezuela	5
Greece	5
Denmark	5
Slovenia	5
Switzerland	5
Belgium	4
Austria	4
Macedonia	4
Armenia	4
Moldova	4
Turkey	3
Bolivia	3
Norway	3
Lebanon	3
Philippines	3
Bosnia and Herzegovina	2
Sri Lanka	2
Chile	2
Estonia	2
Malta	1
U.S. Virgin Islands	1
Albania	1
Azerbaijan	1
Jordan	1
Palestinian Territory	1
Uruguay	1
Dominican Republic	1
Puerto Rico	1

Top 100 coders:

Rank		Name	Country	Penalty	Score
1		liszt1990	United States	33:10	99
2		rem	Russia	33:22	99
3		Ying	United States	39:18	99
4		ahmed.aly	Egypt	45:27	99
5		wcao	United States	48:48	99
6		austrin	United States	49:28	99
7		RalphFurmaniak	United States	49:35	99
8		Jonick	Russia	51:34	99
9		elhipercubo	Netherlands	52:29	99
10		Snail	Russia	52:54	99
11		hansonw1	Canada	53:12	99
12		Astein	South Korea	54:50	99
13		jakubr	Poland	55:25	99
14		Psycho	Bangladesh	56:48	99
15		hos.lyric	Japan	57:55	99
16		cedricl	Canada	58:22	99
17		vexorian	Bolivia	58:49	99
18		pmnox	United States	59:24	99
19		oa12gb	Egypt	59:48	99
20		MauricioC	Brazil	60:30	99
21		wRabbits.nevidomy	Ukraine	61:42	99
22		Lunarmony	United States	61:50	99
23		indy256	Belarus	62:19	99
24		zibada	Russia	62:32	99
25		tmadeira	Brazil	62:48	99
26		slippy	United Kingdom	64:38	99
27		Sergey.Bankevich	Russia	64:52	99
28		dbjorge	United States	65:13	99
29		Sunny	Bangladesh	65:19	99
30		dasko	Poland	65:20	99
31		Gnurdux	United States	66:58	99
32		xhae	South Korea	69:17	99
33		deNULL	Russia	69:25	99
34		syco	India	70:03	99
35		LittlePig	China	70:44	99
36		LayCurse	Japan	71:07	99
37		RichardPang	United States	71:45	99
38		tjhance	United States	71:51	99
39		LittleTiger	China	72:07	99
40		Landertxu	Spain	72:47	99
41		kalinov	Croatia	72:50	99
42		eMBe	Poland	73:41	99
43		turuthok	United States	75:35	99
44		Prostu	Romania	76:32	99
45		supo	Slovakia (Slovak Republic)	77:00	99
46		Nikaustr	United Kingdom	77:18	99
47		satej	Bangladesh	77:30	99
48		Alexey	Romania	78:13	99
49		DmitriyL	Russia	78:14	99
50		Medeiros	Brazil	79:00	99
51		yiuyuho	United States	80:22	99
52		dAnton	Russia	81:01	99
53		tas	New Zealand	81:21	99
54		myprasanna	Canada	81:29	99
55		sbzlyessit	China	82:00	99
56		IP314	Croatia	82:31	99
57		tlawrence85	United States	82:37	99
58		updog	China	84:55	99
59		fancymouse	United States	86:18	99
60		hs484	Japan	86:28	99
61		Daigo	Brazil	86:44	99
62		DD.tt	China	86:55	99
63		EkTePik	Australia	87:18	99
64		TheRaven	United States	87:36	99
65		caligue	Japan	87:39	99
66		Tomzy	Slovenia	87:46	99
67		naguib	Egypt	88:46	99
68		RomanLipovsky	Russia	89:33	99
69		Syzygy	Australia	89:45	99
70		Tinnus	Brazil	90:02	99
71		Narg.	Russia	90:09	99
72		macs	Mexico	90:58	99
73		Minilek	U.S. Virgin Islands	91:25	99
74		ShangJingbo	China	91:28	99
75		fengzlzl	China	94:09	99
76		IslamDiaa	Egypt	94:18	99
77		imai0917	South Korea	94:31	99
78		MarioYC	Peru	96:14	99
79		shimps	India	97:45	99
80		tzik	Japan	97:46	99
81		radeye	United States	97:50	99
82		daybreakcx	China	98:49	99
83		gabrielrcp	Brazil	100:52	99
84		palkooo	Slovakia (Slovak Republic)	100:59	99
85		Ahbong	Taiwan	104:20	99
86		Etrnls	China	105:26	99
87		gregstoll	United States	106:35	99
88		WildUtah	Mexico	106:41	99
89		jpg7	United States	106:48	99
90		Chrono	Bulgaria	108:02	99
91		foobarbaz	United States	109:25	99
92		rxp	United States	109:30	99
93		Smithers	United Kingdom	110:14	99
94		Rustyoldman	United States	110:48	99
95		igorkulev	Macedonia	110:50	99
96		andrehahn	Brazil	111:20	99
97		gizzywump	United States	111:36	99
98		zyx	Venezuela	111:37	99
99		RicardoHahn	Brazil	112:22	99
100		MRain	China	113:06	99

Qualified Candidates:

Country	Participants	Qualified
Albania	2	1
Algeria	2	1
Andorra	1	0
Angola	1	1
Argentina	123	107
Armenia	9	9
Australia	136	121
Austria	19	19
Azerbaijan	3	3
Bangladesh	77	70
Barbados	1	1
Belarus	65	61
Belgium	24	24
Bermuda	1	0
Bhutan	1	0
Bolivia	7	7
Bosnia and Herzegovina	4	4
Brazil	338	310
Bulgaria	54	52
Canada	159	149
Chile	23	20
China	1284	1194
Colombia	75	69
Congo, Democratic Republic of The	1	1
Costa Rica	2	2
Croatia	27	26
Czech Republic	45	43
Denmark	26	24
Dominican Republic	6	6
Ecuador	1	0
Egypt	94	90
Estonia	17	14
Ethiopia	1	1
Finland	19	19
France	88	81
Georgia	16	16
Germany	99	93
Ghana	3	2
Greece	20	18
Guatemala	7	7
Hong Kong	72	67
Hungary	91	86
Iceland	1	1
India	1331	1124
Indonesia	73	64
Iran	1	1
Ireland	4	3
Israel	45	42
Italy	59	55
Japan	313	285
Jordan	8	8
Kazakhstan	23	23
Kenya	7	5
Latvia	18	18
Lebanon	17	14
Lithuania	22	21
Macedonia	16	16
Madagascar	1	1
Malaysia	8	6
Malta	1	1
Mexico	77	71
Moldova	9	8
Morocco	8	8
Namibia	1	1
Netherlands	51	46
New Zealand	34	30
Nicaragua	1	1
Nigeria	6	6
Norway	10	10
Oman	2	2
Pakistan	44	30
Palestinian Territory	6	5
Paraguay	1	1
Peru	35	31
Philippines	18	15
Poland	232	223
Portugal	41	37
Puerto Rico	1	1
Romania	119	105
Russia	504	483
Rwanda	1	1
Saudi Arabia	3	3
Serbia	17	15
Singapore	61	57
Slovakia (Slovak Republic)	53	52
Slovenia	7	7
South Africa	59	55
South Korea	182	165
Spain	89	80
Sri Lanka	21	19
St Vincent & Grenadines	1	1
Sweden	31	30
Switzerland	34	34
Taiwan	122	115
Thailand	92	79
Tunisia	1	1
Turkey	44	37
U.S. Virgin Islands	1	1
Uganda	1	1
Ukraine	190	184
United Arab Emirates	4	4
United Kingdom	117	103
United States	1164	1060
Uruguay	6	6
Uzbekistan	2	2
Venezuela	29	27
Vietnam	80	74
Zimbabwe	1	1

All Participants Complete List:
http://siddiq.info/jam2009/all-participants-google-code-jam-2009-qualification-round.html

For more detail on the contest:
http://code.google.com/codejam

Contest Analysis (official):
http://code.google.com/codejam/contest/dashboard?c=90101#s=a


If you like to see more detailed statistics, please comments!

[Humor] Do you have any other browser? Mozzarella? Chrome?

"Do you have any other browser? 'Mozzarella'? Chrome?" asked the tech support agent of PTCL DSL. My first impression of PTCL tech support fallen down 100 ft underground.

Funny thing happened. The other day, the installation guy had installed the modem but didn't get the internet working. He didn't even know what username and password should he put in. He tried a couple of them (from his hand written notes) but none of them worked. Lights went down (load shedding) so he left things unfinished.

Now the funny thing is he reported his manager that modem installation was successful. Since that is what the CRM is telling the tech support agents.

There are a lot of things I can do here. But I infer that PTCL has a poor technical support and pitifully inferior and miserable low profile work style.

Ok here is my feedback to PTCL tech support:
PTCL DSL =

What's Wateen doing? 1mbps = 1620 PKR???

I just happened to learn their three new packages with no download limit:
1mbps -> PKR 1620
512kbps -> PKR 1520
256kbps -> PKR 1420

Now how on earth does this compare with PTCL's eVDO technology and the package they offer ??? i.e.
3mbps -> PKR 2000
Plus, EVO terminal is a USB device so its portable and it does not require external power other then USB socket (i.e. no WAPDA).

Secondly, whats with difference of RS 100 with every package???


PTCL eVDO technology
http://www.ptcl.com.pk/contentb.php?NID=199#packages

Wateen Wimax Service
http://www.wateen.com
They don't have details of new packages on the website by the time I was writing this blog. So I called their helpline 111365111.

FileZilla much better then gFTP and others

FileZilla is the solid, feature-rich and practical ftp client that one should be looking for all needs.

I had been using Kasablanca, gFTP, Nautilus and Konquoror. But was dissatisfied with the goodness we expect in Liunx. I wondered why I wasn't using FileZilla before. Maybe because FileZilla is not reviewed enough in blogs?





Install on Fedora:
yum install filezilla

Ubuntu:
sudo apt-get install filezilla

VirtualBox vs Vmware

Here's my first go with the VirtualBox. (For a detailed review I found Jason Perlow's article very useful Virtualization smackdown: Sun xVM VirtualBox 1.6 vs. VMWare Server 2.0 Beta 2)

I had been enjoying a fedora laptop. (Yes, its not Ubuntu. I will write in another blog about my reason for dislikeness)
Then I gave a shot to redmond os in my virtual space. Both VMware and Vbox went smooth and great.

Here are the screen shots:


Fig: VirtualBox's "seamless mode" is the feature I love. Here is a screen shot with it. Notice the windows taskbar aligned with top and kde's taskbar aligned with bottom.



The desktop background is the default fedora's and then IE window running in the foreground.



In the last screen shot if you look closely, an IE window (right) is running in the guest OS and the Firefox window (left) is running in the host OS. Thats the beauty of the Seamless mode.


Although VMware has been the industry leader and default choice for personal and enterprise level virtualization requirements for many years. But now Vbox is equally solid, feature rich and no less.

In short, I personally feel that over the time VirtualBox will carve a broader market share in virtualization. It has more support of host systems.
Where VMware may become verticle solution for specialized needs focusing on datacenters with machines running on Windows/Linux hosts.

Toshiba's new invention made battery 101% effective?

After a lot of battery training and power optimization I finally managed to make battery run for 30 minutes instead. Previously the battery used to run for only 7 minutes.

Battery charged to 101%??????

The laptop is old P4 with 512MB ram and 3.0GHz processor clock speed. Loads Netbeans 6.1 in two minutes :)